A jade lizard is an options position built from two pieces sold together in the same expiration: an out-of-the-money short put and a short call spread above the market. Both pieces collect premium, and the structure's defining rule is that the total credit must exceed the width of the call spread. When that holds, the position cannot lose on a rally — at expiration, the most the call spread can ever pay out is its width, and the credit already covers it. However far the market runs, the upside finishes at a small, fixed profit.
The risk lives entirely below the market. Under the short put strike, a jade lizard behaves like any short put: losses grow point-for-point with the underlying, cushioned only by the premium taken in. The trade suits a view that a market will hold above support or drift sideways-to-higher, for a seller who wants more credit than a naked put alone pays without accepting risk in both directions the way a short strangle does.
The Three Legs
All in one expiration:
- Sell an out-of-the-money put.
- Sell an out-of-the-money call.
- Buy a further out-of-the-money call.
Equity index skew is why the structure earns its keep. Index puts trade at persistently higher implied volatility than equidistant calls, so the put leg carries most of the premium. The call spread exists to add credit above the market without adding unbounded exposure — and, sized correctly, to push the total past the spread width so the upside seals shut.
The Credit-Versus-Width Test
Net credit ≥ call-spread width → no possible loss above the market at expiration.
Every number below is hypothetical. Say ES trades at 5,600 and you build the position roughly 45 days from expiration:
- Sell the 5,500 put for 24.00 points.
- Sell the 5,650 call for 14.00 points.
- Buy the 5,675 call for 6.00 points.
Check the worst upside case. ES settles at 6,000, far through both call strikes. The put expires worthless. The spread finishes at full width — the 5,650 short call costs 350.00 points while the 5,675 long call returns 325.00, a 25.00-point loss on that piece. Against 32.00 collected, the trade still nets +7.00 points ($350 per contract), and the figure is identical whether ES settles at 5,676 or 7,000. No price above the long call produces a loss.
Now shrink the credit. Had the same strikes brought in only 20.00 total, a settlement above 5,675 would lose 25.00 − 20.00 = 5.00 points. That position is not a jade lizard by the strict definition — it is a capped strangle that still carries upside risk. The entry question is always the same: does the premium clear the width? One caution on thin margins: when the credit beats the width by only a fraction of a point, fees across four legs can flip a mathematically safe upside into a small real loss. I treat anything under a full point of cushion as failing the test.

